Showing posts with label literature. Show all posts
Showing posts with label literature. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 7, 2021

Entr'acte: sonnets

 If those previous posts were the first Act, and if more are to follow, I need a short diversion.

Something short and snappy. My natural verbosity will not deliver, so I'll still go for the diversion.

I'm not going to explain again the sonnet form. Nor attempt a history of it. I'll just pluck a few petals on the way.

First up, although it had been around in early Italian since the thirteenth century, it didn't arrive in England until the sixteenth.


Usually Sir Thomas Wyatt (as left, by Holbein) and Henry Howard, earl of Surrey get that credit
. It says much about mid-sixteenth-century courtly life that both those worthies had flirtations with the headsman's axe. Wyatt was in deep doo-doo through an association with Anne Boleyn which put him in the Tower to witness her end. He was saved by his friendship with Thomas Cromwell (they shared, serially, a mistress, Elizabeth Darrell).

Henry Howard, the earl of Surrey, was not so spared. He was a trifle too closely related to the head that wore the crown for comfort; and he had too short a temper for a courtier of Henry Tudor. He became the king's last victim.

I've tried to engage with their sonnets; but never managed to be properly uplifted or enthused.

I'm sure I should rave about Bill Shagspur's efforts. Some we know too well; others have the odour of a sonnet factory (one cannot maintain prime quality over 154 of them). And I've had to teach them too often. Perhaps his best are those almost hidden in Romeo and Juliet (far too good a play to be wasted on the young): the Prologue and the heavily-truncated two tiercets of the Epilogue, but above all the hands motif when the lovers first engage.

My salivation improved with Milton:

Avenge, O Lord, thy slaughter’d saints, whose bones 
Lie scatter’d on the Alpine mountains cold ...

Spit it out, man!

Slain by the bloody Piemontese that roll’d
Mother with infant down the rocks. 
There! Bet you felt better for that! There's nothing like a piece of invective for clearing the pipes. Some day I must set to discover what incident (apart from a general loathing of Roman Catholicism) prompted Milton's outburst.

Here's another that stuck: Keats gob-smacked On First Looking into Chapman's Homer. The doughty explorers climb a hill, and find themselves facing a vast new Ocean:
... like stout Cortez when with eagle eyes 
He star'd at the Pacific — and all his men 
Look'd at each other with a wild surmise — 
Silent, upon a peak in Darien.

Pity it wasn't Cortez: but then 'Vasco Núñez de Balboa' is never going to fit iambic pentameter.

Allow me to cut to the chase.

There are a couple of modern sonnets that work for me. Both are very Irish, but speak to a wider audience. Both of whose authors I remember seeing in Dublin. Heaney, still unpublished but one we knew to watch, was athwart the cobbles of TCD's Front Square, in deep conversation with Michael Longley, and (I believe) with Derek Mahon. One at least was smoking a cigarette.

First of them, Famous Seamus:

Dogger, Rockall, Malin, Irish Sea:
Green, swift upsurges, North Atlantic flux   
Conjured by that strong gale-warning voice,   
Collapse into a sibilant penumbra.
Midnight and closedown. Sirens of the tundra,
Of eel-road, seal-road, keel-road, whale-road, raise   
Their wind-compounded keen behind the baize   
And drive the trawlers to the lee of Wicklow.   
L’Etoile, Le Guillemot, La Belle Hélène   
Nursed their bright names this morning in the bay   
That toiled like mortar. It was marvellous   
And actual, I said out loud, ‘A haven,’   
The word deepening, clearing, like the sky  
Elsewhere on Minches, Cromarty, The Faroes.

Heaney had withdrawn from the Troubles to Glanmore in the County Wicklow, a few kilometres inland from Wicklow town. I imagine him listening to the  post-midnight Shipping Forecast from the BBC. His sonnet twists back to the very beginnings of early English poetry, and their kennings, those metaphors, of Icelandic and Anglo-Saxon verse. Just as the storm drives the French fishing-boats to shelter in the lee of Wicklow, so his home in the Republic is A Haven.

OK: well it works for me.

If that one is good, this is even better: Paddy Kavanagh — who I was taken to observe in McDaid's in Harry Street. The evening was yet young, because Kavanagh was merely hunched and solitary.

Kavanagh exploited the sonnet form, playing fast-and-loose with formal rules — and, as we are about to see, whole rhymes. Many propose Canal Bank Walk as his great achievement. Fair enough, say I, provided you are not being blinded by Hilda Moriarty

This one, though, is both simply and grandly, Epic:

I have lived in important places, times
When great events were decided, who owned
That half a rood of rock, a no-man's land
Surrounded by our pitchfork-armed claims.
I heard the Duffys shouting "Damn your soul!"
And old McCabe stripped to the waist, seen
Step the plot defying blue cast-steel -
"Here is the march along these iron stones."
That was the year of the Munich bother. Which
Was more important? I inclined
To lose my faith in Ballyrush and Gortin
Till Homer's ghost came whispering to my mind.
He said: I made the Iliad from such
A local row. Gods make their own importance.

Sphere: Related Content

Sunday, September 5, 2021

Fallen from grace

If the human race truly sprang from Eden, what could possibly persuade them to move to industrial Lancashire? Of course: the force of necessity.


Friedrich Engels, the elder, owned a mill in Salford. His son, living well on the profits, excoriated the system in The Condition of the Working Class in England (1845). There is no connection there to Dickens: the English translation didn't appear until 1887.

It didn't need Engels, Junior, to tell the English middle classes of the squalor and brutality of the factory system. A railway journey through through any industrial suburb would have shown what was involved. Dickens himself made many such a trip, and witnessed it for himself.

So I cannot casually pass by on the other side, without adding to my list:

13: Charles Dickens, Hard Times, for These Times.


When I look up there, above my left shoulder — between Michael Dibden and JP Donleavy — Hard Times seems slimmer (even in annotated academic edition) than others of his novels. It is 'only' 110,000 words, which is short-shrift for Dickens. It appeared in twenty instalments over the summer of 1854. It has the classic 'triple-decker' structure to go with the seasons — Sowing, Reaping, Garnering. If we are not already on the same page, try Galatians, 6, particularly verse 8 (and Mr Dickens would never have used anything less than KJV):

For he that soweth to his flesh shall of the flesh reap corruption; but he that soweth to the Spirit shall of the Spirit reap life everlasting.

The opening of Hard Times bashes us over the head with that antithesis. By name and nature, in a gaunt classroom, Thomas Gradgrind (patron of education and local MP) interrogates:

the little pitchers before him, who were to be filled so full of facts.

Later, chapter IV with Mr Bounderby, we find the forenames of Gradgrind's five children: young Thomas, Adam Smith, Malthius — and (tellingly for gender discrimination) Louisa and little Jane.

Gradgrind meets his match in Cissy Jupe, the circus-clown's daughter:

‘Girl number twenty,’ said Mr. Gradgrind, squarely pointing with his square forefinger, ‘I don’t know that girl. Who is that girl?’

‘Sissy Jupe, sir,’ explained number twenty, blushing, standing up, and curtseying.

‘Sissy is not a name,’ said Mr. Gradgrind. ‘Don’t call yourself Sissy.  Call yourself Cecilia.’

‘It’s father as calls me Sissy, sir,’ returned the young girl in a trembling voice, and with another curtsey.

‘Then he has no business to do it,’ said Mr. Gradgrind. ‘Tell him he mustn’t.  Cecilia Jupe.  Let me see.  What is your father?’

‘He belongs to the horse-riding, if you please, sir.’

Mr. Gradgrind frowned, and waved off the objectionable calling with his hand.

‘We don’t want to know anything about that, here. You mustn’t tell us about that, here. Your father breaks horses, don’t he?’

‘If you please, sir, when they can get any to break, they do break horses in the ring, sir.’

‘You mustn’t tell us about the ring, here. Very well, then. Describe your father as a horsebreaker.  He doctors sick horses, I dare say?’

‘Oh yes, sir.’

‘Very well, then. He is a veterinary surgeon, a farrier, and horsebreaker. Give me your definition of a horse.’

(Sissy Jupe thrown into the greatest alarm by this demand.)

‘Girl number twenty unable to define a horse!’ said Mr. Gradgrind, for the general behoof of all the little pitchers. ‘Girl number twenty possessed of no facts, in reference to one of the commonest of animals! Some boy’s definition of a horse [...]'

Two reasons I failed to be a novelist were inabilities to develop a plot or manage convincing dialogue: but note again the gender discrimination. Dickens always implies far more than he tells us.

Louisa Gradgrind will be married off to Bounderby (the marriage quickly fails: he is disgraced) to be saved by the family life of Sissy. Tom will rob Bounderby's bank: Sissy will try to save him through the circus, and he escapes on a emigrant ship (and dies of fever).

The last chapter is Final. The wrap of a Dickens story is ever a quick once-over-lightly to fulfil the need in a good morality. In Hard Times it seems more abrupt than ever — almost like one of those movies where the production money runs out before the final reel.

There is a complex sub-plot involving exploited work-folk, heroic and honest labourers, and even embryonic trades unions (but also a whiff of Fred Kyte). This tends to grab those looking for 'social realism'.

And yet ...

For me the truly endearing character is Mr Sleary, the owner of the circus and 'Signor Jupe'. He is what Bounderby and Gradgrind fail to be: the successful businessman, who adopts Sissy.

The people of the circus are the antithesis of Gradgrind's natural order:

They all assumed to be mighty rakish and knowing, they were not very tidy in their private dresses, they were not at all orderly in their domestic arrangements, and the combined literature of the whole company would have produced but a poor letter on any subject.  Yet there was a remarkable gentleness and childishness about these people, a special inaptitude for any kind of sharp practice, and an untiring readiness to help and pity one another, deserving often of as much respect, and always of as much generous construction, as the every-day virtues of any class of people in the world.

Dickens makes Sleazy a zany:

Mr. Sleary: a stout man as already mentioned, with one fixed eye, and one loose eye, a voice (if it can be called so) like the efforts of a broken old pair of bellows, a flabby surface, and a muddled head which was never sober and never drunk.

He is, though, always in charge of the admission booth and the takings. He has his mantra, book-ending the main story (chapter VI of Sowing and — here, in the fuller version — the penultimate chapter of the book):

Thquire, thake handth, firtht and latht!  Don’t be croth with uth poor vagabondth.  People mutht be amuthed.  They can’t be alwayth a learning, nor yet they can’t be alwayth a working, they an’t made for it.  You mutht have uth, Thquire.  Do the withe thing and the kind thing too, and make the betht of uth; not the wurtht!’

‘And I never thought before,’ said Mr. Sleary, putting his head in at the door again to say it, ‘that I wath tho muth of a Cackler!’ 

p. 222




Sphere: Related Content

Saturday, September 4, 2021

What the Dickens!

Sometime in the intermission between lock-downs, we escaped to Porto. The Pert Young Piece insisted we join the throng to gain admission to Livraria Lello. One pays to get in, and reclaims the expense against a purchase. Seems sound enough business practice, and I came away with a small anthology of Camões (whom I have frequently mentioned as part of the epic tradition, but never really read at any length). Despite the hordes desperate to view that Harry Potter stair-case, the bookseller took pity on my age, allowed me to sit and muse, and engaged me in conversation — at one point thrusting a Dickens first-edition into my hands.



I've never bothered to order my preference for Dickens' writings. On first thoughts, I prefer the later ones to anything before Copperfield (1850) — though even that ending is a trifle oily and unctuous for modern tastes. Probably bottom of the league, and teetering on relegation would be Chuzzlewit (1844), where I sense the creative juice was running a trifle thin. 

On the other hand, there are the 'hard' novels — not just Our Mutual Friend (1865), because of its complexity, depth and length — but Bleak House (1853) and Hard Times (1854). Those latter two are my top spots. 

12. Charles Dickens: Bleak House

I've been obsessing over openers above. The starter here, In Chancery, has to be exemplary. At his luxuriant best, Dickens develops a massive metaphor: a true 'London peculiar' and the fog of the judiciary:

London. Michaelmas term lately over, and the Lord Chancellor sitting in Lincoln's Inn Hall. Implacable November weather. As much mud in the streets as if the waters had but newly retired from the face of the earth, and it would not be wonderful to meet a Megalosaurus, forty feet long or so, waddling like an elephantine lizard up Holborn Hill. Smoke lowering down from chimney-pots, making a soft black drizzle, with flakes of soot in it as big as full-grown snowflakes—gone into mourning, one might imagine, for the death of the sun. Dogs, undistinguishable in mire. Horses, scarcely better; splashed to their very blinkers. Foot passengers, jostling one another's umbrellas in a general infection of ill temper, and losing their foot-hold at street-corners, where tens of thousands of other foot passengers have been slipping and sliding since the day broke (if this day ever broke), adding new deposits to the crust upon crust of mud, sticking at those points tenaciously to the pavement, and accumulating at compound interest.

Fog everywhere. Fog up the river, where it flows among green aits and meadows; fog down the river, where it rolls defiled among the tiers of shipping and the waterside pollutions of a great (and dirty) city. Fog on the Essex marshes, fog on the Kentish heights. Fog creeping into the cabooses of collier-brigs; fog lying out on the yards and hovering in the rigging of great ships; fog drooping on the gunwales of barges and small boats. Fog in the eyes and throats of ancient Greenwich pensioners, wheezing by the firesides of their wards; fog in the stem and bowl of the afternoon pipe of the wrathful skipper, down in his close cabin; fog cruelly pinching the toes and fingers of his shivering little 'prentice boy on deck. Chance people on the bridges peeping over the parapets into a nether sky of fog, with fog all round them, as if they were up in a balloon and hanging in the misty clouds.

Gas looming through the fog in divers places in the streets, much as the sun may, from the spongey fields, be seen to loom by husbandman and ploughboy. Most of the shops lighted two hours before their time—as the gas seems to know, for it has a haggard and unwilling look.

The raw afternoon is rawest, and the dense fog is densest, and the muddy streets are muddiest near that leaden-headed old obstruction, appropriate ornament for the threshold of a leaden-headed old corporation, Temple Bar. And hard by Temple Bar, in Lincoln's Inn Hall, at the very heart of the fog, sits the Lord High Chancellor in his High Court of Chancery.

One of the few joys of A-level teaching is a 'bright' class cracking open their clean, new paperbacks. Quick clearing of throat, and I, the centre of attention, can indulge in those rolling paragraphs. Never deny the latent thesp in any teacher. With luck, one of the brightest of the bright may quibble over Megalosaurus:

Did they really know of dinosaurs in the 1860s?

Oh yes, indeed, my fine friend. And they were an English discovery. The Rev. Dr. William Buckland, Oxford geologist and (get this!) Dean of Westminster, found the first one in a slate quarry: it still has its place in Oxford University's museum of Natural History. 'Not many people know that!' (to be delivered in the rôle of Michael Caine). Other, different species started to come out of the strata, so Richard Owen (who thought Darwin's theory too simplistic) had to invent the omnibus term, 'dinosaur', in 1842.

It needs a certain input of imaginary puissance to conjure up the smog and filth of a London still dependent on coal fires and horse-drawn vehicles, though gas lamps might just be graspable.

The plot derives from the convolutions of the epic law-suit, Jarndyce and Jarndyce, which is the main link between a whole phalanx of characters. The main two are Lady Dedlock and Esther Summers. We soon realise they are mother and her illegitimate daughter, by the recently dead 'Nemo' (Captain Hawdon). Dickens manages a complex detective story over how Lady Dedlock unravels who is who.

Inevitably (did we expect anything else?), Lady Dedlock's shame is exposed; and she flees her marriage, leaving a note of confession and apology. The conniving lawyer, Mr Tulkinghorn, is found shot dead — suspicion falls on the fugitive Lady Dedlock. One of the more remarkable characters of the story, Inspector Bucket, now become central: he is commissioned to find her.

This provides — especially for one who spent four decades living in the locality — a moment of extreme tension. Bucket pursues Lady Dedlock along the turnpike road (we'd now call it, in its modern form, Archway Road) as it climbs up to the old turnpike at the junction with the present Muswell Hill Road. In driving snow. Leading to the final encounter of Esther and her mother, wearing (this is Victorian melodrama) the clothes of Jenny, the mother of the dead child —




I saw before me, lying on the step, the mother of the dead child. She lay there with one arm creeping round a bar of the iron gate and seeming to embrace it. She lay there, who had so lately spoken to my mother. She lay there, a distressed, unsheltered, senseless creature. She who had brought my mother's letter, who could give me the only clue to where my mother was; she, who was to guide us to rescue and save her whom we had sought so far, who had come to this condition by some means connected with my mother that I could not follow, and might be passing beyond our reach and help at that moment; she lay there, and they stopped me! I saw but did not comprehend the solemn and compassionate look in Mr. Woodcourt's face. I saw but did not comprehend his touching the other [Bucket] on the breast to keep him back. I saw him stand uncovered in the bitter air, with a reverence for something. But my understanding for all this was gone.

I even heard it said between them, "Shall she go?"

"She had better go. Her hands should be the first to touch her. They have a higher right than ours."

I passed on to the gate and stooped down. I lifted the heavy head, put the long dank hair aside, and turned the face. And it was my mother, cold and dead.

 

One can read into the story whatever one wishes: the law's delays, the foibles of fortune, Victorian moralities ... 

Bucket often gets the credit of being the first detective in English fiction. The 'detective branch' of  the Metropolitan Police date from 1842: CID wouldn't come along until 1878. Three articles by Dickens, from 1850 before he was formulating Bleak House, show his growing interest in the work of the detectives. In one, On Duty with Inspector Field, Dickens accompanied Field and his bag-man, Rogers, into the grim slums and cellars of 'the rookery of St Giles' (which would be swept away to make New Oxford Street and Charing Cross Road):

How many people may there be in London, who, if we had brought them deviously and blindfold, to this street, fifty paces from the Station House, and within call of Saint Giles's church, would know it for a not remote part of the city in which their lives are passed? How many, who amidst this compound of sickening smells, these heaps of filth, these tumbling houses, with all their vile contents, animate, and inanimate, slimily overflowing into the black road, would believe that they breathe THIS air? How much Red Tape may there be, that could look round on the faces which now hem us in - for our appearance here has caused a rush from all points to a common centre - the lowering foreheads, the sallow cheeks, the brutal eyes, the matted hair, the infected, vermin-haunted heaps of rags - and say, 'I have thought of this. I have not dismissed the thing. I have neither blustered it away, nor frozen it away, nor tied it up and put it away, nor smoothly said pooh, pooh! to it when it has been shown to me?'

Inspector Field was not just a creation of Dickens, patrolling the British Museum:
Inspector Field is, to-night, the guardian genius of the British Museum. He is bringing his shrewd eye to bear on every corner of its solitary galleries, before he reports 'all right.' Suspicious of the Elgin marbles, and not to be done by cat-faced Egyptian giants with their hands upon their knees, Inspector Field, sagacious, vigilant, lamp in hand, throwing monstrous shadows on the walls and ceilings, passes through the spacious rooms. If a mummy trembled in an atom of its dusty covering, Inspector Field would say, 'Come out of that, Tom Green. I know you!' If the smallest 'Gonoph' about town were crouching at the bottom of a classic bath, Inspector Field would nose him with a finer scent than the ogre's, when adventurous Jack lay trembling in his kitchen copper. But all is quiet, and Inspector Field goes warily on, making little outward show of attending to anything in particular, just recognising the Ichthyosaurus as a familiar acquaintance, and wondering, perhaps, how the detectives did it in the days before the Flood.
He was a very real and identifiable person, Charles Field, and the obvious model for Inspector Bucket.


Sphere: Related Content

Thursday, September 2, 2021

Gored

Gore Vidal came to London: it must have been his last visit. He was promoting his final collection of essays.

A select group assembled in the basement of Bush House, where he was interviewed by James Naughtie. That's a bit presumptuous in itself: Vidal was never greatly to be confined by the limits of an 'interview', and pontificated in his usual acerbic generality.

I have collections of Vidal's essays here; but that's not my topic here.

8. Gore Vidal: Narratives of Empire

The curse of being an acclaimed American writer is the chimera of The Great American Novel. Nobody has ever successfully planted the flag on the top of that prominent peak; but generation-after-generation they keep trying.


Vidal went for this extended novel sequence, which developed into a heptology, seven of them,. Any one of which could stand here (and do squat, all in paperback, on the seventh shelf down behind me). The tattered state of my Burr (570-odd pages plus an afterword) shows it has been with me since the 1970s — so that was when I started on this exploration:

The publication sequence was:

  • Washington DC, 1967 — but slots in as the sixth in chronology.  It is thinly-disguised autobiography of Vidal's family and youth, against the presidencies of FDR, Truman and Ike.
  • Burr, 1973, was the secon in publication, but the first in chronology. Vidal, like a dog with a lamp-post, marks his territory by dedication the book to his nephews, inclding one, Burr.
  • Bi-centenary year, 1976, was marked by 1876. Gore exploits that through an elaborate analogy on social divides and elctoral mayhem. This is the third in both publication and chronology.
  • Fourth in publication, but second in the chronology, was Lincoln, 1984.
  • For the fifth,  Empire, 1987, Vidal entered the world of the great capitalist families of the McKinley and Teddy Roosevelt era. A particular focus is the burgeoning media power of William Randolph Hearst.
  • That leads naturally into the sixth, the mutual exploitation of media and government in the WW1 years and after: Hollywood, 1990. I expect many, taken by the character of Caroline Sanford, would mark this one as the pick of the litter.
  • Finally, The Golden Age, 2000. Vidal takes on the then-fashionable notion that FDR manipulated US entry into WW2. Which led into the world-power era of the Cold War. Vidal gives himself a walk-on part.

As I said, anyone of those could deserve an entry in this choice.  The first and last of that order above are, arguably, the nearest to 'great literature'; and The Golden Age is Vidal's mature shot at 'The Great American Novel'. However, I'll go for Lincoln as my personal pick.

A classic starter for any fiction is the stranger moseying into town or, in Chaucer's Tales (don't worry — I'll get there!) two and a half dozen on their way out of town.

That's how Vidal gets Lincoln going. Try this:













Were I back teaching, I'd be using that as a casebook example. There's the essential racial theme established, the sense of menace, and critcal foreshadowing. Along with strong depiction of the context, and considerable characterisation lready.

Sphere: Related Content

Thursday, July 29, 2010

The word in the street

Malcolm was scanning the Irish Times in its moment of self-congratulation: Dublin was to be the next UNESCO city of literature.


Fair enough, even if some of Eileen Battersby's claims on "literary Dubliners" pressed the limits of l'actualité:

Seamus Heaney Awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1995. While Heaney is very much identified with his native Northern Ireland, since 1976 he has lived in Dublin ...

Her claim on Oliver Goldsmith is even more dubious, depending as it is on an undergraduate course in TCD and a statue.


Were her hand also in the accompanying editorial, it had there a surer touch:

The submission to Unesco goes straight to the point when it states that “Dublin’s chief credentials as a City of Literature lie in the historical body of work that has come from its writers over the centuries and from the equally acclaimed contemporary output of writers native to, or living within, the city’s confines”.

Sometimes out of rejection or disillusionment with the home place, but often for economic reasons, many of those same writers chose escape and exile: Richard Brinsley Sheridan, Bram Stoker, Wilde, Shaw, O’Casey, Beckett and most famously the author who declared that if the city were to vanish overnight it could be reconstructed from the pages of his quintessential Dublin novel Ulysses .

But there are others who stayed or finally settled in the city and that litany of names is equally illustrious: Mangan, Yeats, Behan, Flann O’Brien, Kinsella and Austin Clarke who, like Swift, returned after years spent in London.

As well as the writers native to the city, many others, by making it their home, have enriched its literary DNA: McGahern came from Leitrim, Kennelly from Kerry, Cronin from Wexford and Heaney from Derry.

When he once remarked that the city had its share of “assassins whose weapons are the tongue and the typewriter”, the poet Brendan Kennelly, no doubt, was in a playful mood. But the sense of Dublin as a writers’ city is all-pervading and the tradition lives on in the many contemporary novelists, poets and playwrights who today continue with the task of helping us in our self-understanding as a people. “Strumpet City” can indeed hold her head high as a city of literature.

What caught Malcolm's attention even more firmly was the list of previously-designated "cities of literature": Edinburgh, Melbourne, and Iowa City.


Edinburgh is too obvious: no explanation needed.


Melbourne? Well, UNESCO's own definition is:

... a city of extraordinary diversity in literary activity, Melbourne is a vibrant arena for the creation of literary works. The capital of the south-eastern state of Victoria and a major business centre within the Asia-Pacific region is widely acknowledged as Australia's cultural capital.

"Australia's cultural capital" My, my! Just think of the competition!


As for native Melbourne literary figures, there's obviously Germaine Greer, and Jim Morrison ... and the Dirty Digger ... and the astral Kylie ...


But Iowa City? Why?


Well, Malcolm, prepare to be amazed:

It has a strong literary history and is the home of the Iowa Writers' Workshop, whose graduates include John Irving, Flannery O'Connor, T.C. Boyle and many other prominent American authors ...

This literary heritage is also shown in the Iowa Avenue Literary Walk, a series of bronze relief panels that feature authors' words as well as attribution. The panels are visually connected by a series of general quotations about books and writing stamped into the concrete sidewalk. All 49 authors and playwrights featured in the Literary Walk have ties to Iowa.

But as the Vonnegut quotation on that Literary Walk pertinently says:

We are what we pretend to be, so we must be careful about what we pretend to be.

Sphere: Related Content

Tuesday, July 20, 2010


The smallest public tart

Over on much-improved (with added oppositional zing!) Malcolm Redfellow's Home Service there is a note about the latest invention of Britain's new reforming government.

Quangos are out! They have to be trashed for Better Government!

Instead we have "Offices":
  • the Office for Budget responsibility (main function so far, covering up the gaffes in the "emergency budget");
and now the bright, shiny:
  • Office for Tax Simplification (staffed by Tory re-treads and their Big Accountancy and Tax Lawyer friends).
Those who question whether such innovations are quite so advanced, progressive and "modern" should remember that Charles Dickens, too, was disenchanted by them:
The Circumlocution Office was (as everybody knows without being
told) the most important Department under Government. No public
business of any kind could possibly be done at any time without the
acquiescence of the Circumlocution Office. Its finger was in the
largest public pie, and in the smallest public tart. It was
equally impossible to do the plainest right and to undo the
plainest wrong without the express authority of the Circumlocution
Office. If another Gunpowder Plot had been discovered half an hour
before the lighting of the match, nobody would have been justified
in saving the parliament until there had been half a score of
boards, half a bushel of minutes, several sacks of official
memoranda, and a family-vault full of ungrammatical correspondence,
on the part of the Circumlocution Office.
That was back in 1855.

All we lack now is a public official caught with his finger in the smallest public tart.

Sphere: Related Content
Subscribe with Bloglines International Affairs Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
 
Add to Technorati Favorites