Thursday, November 22, 2007


X324FEV

That could be a State secret.

Malcolm, at home base after a time in Yorkshire, watched Cameron 4 News ... sorry, simple mistake: Channel 4 News.

As usual Jon Snow was in the bricks-without-straw game, making "news" out of something recycled. Inevitably, it was the great "missing data disks" saga. This revealed ... precisely nothing that hadn't been in the papers already. (Malcolm's recent reading has been the Times, the Guardian, the Telegraph and--drum roll--the Yorkshire Post.)

It was cross-cut with a YouGov poll (as in "What do you want us to find, Guv?"). Well, inevitably there was a blurring of who did the polling, because one minute it's YouGov, but the next it's Cathy Newman insisting (on behalf of C4 News, presumably) that "We asked 1,600 people ..."

Who asked, Cathy? Was it you and C4, or an "independent" polling organisation? The confusion must be deliberate, because you are then saying the Tories now enjoy "the biggest lead Channel 4 pollsters have given" them. So, again, one must ask: are these figures reliable and independent, or are they what you contracted them to find?

But that isn't Malcolm's gripe.

This was an item appended to a major issue of data security. So, why, twice (once at the 7pm showing, then again at the hour-later repeat just to make sure), did Channnel 4 publicise the registration number of the Prime Minister's official car? Al-Qaeda operatives, please note: Channel 4 News need a headline story for next week.

All passion spent

The best piece on the "missing disks" yet is from Anatole Kaletsky in today's Times.

It is good because it is the first successful attempt to keep a cool head, be objective, and dispassionately apportion responsibility. Unlike Channel 4 News and the thundering herd of the Tory press, Kaletsky isn't just making hay.

He starts by setting out his stall:
What lessons should be drawn from the string of disasters suddenly befalling Gordon Brown and his unlucky successor as Chancellor, disasters that have demolished in two months the reputation for economic competence that the previous Blair-Brown Government took ten years to build up? I can think of four. The first is about proportionality. The second is about responsibility. The third is about focus and priorities. The fourth is about politics and a fatal flaw in Gordon Brown's personality that many people suspected all along.
The proportionality bit is a simple comparison; does the ordinary gal or guy get better service from an official or a commercial source. His opinion is that the UK Government's:
bureaucracies are now working more smoothly and dealing with customers more quickly than in the days before computerisation. They are generally more efficient and easier to deal with than similar agencies in America, Germany or France.

Moreover, they now compare quite well with comparable private sector bureaucracies such as telephone companies, utilities, banks or airlines. A phone call to the HMRC or the Passport Agency is probably as likely to be answered promptly — and by an employee who is both courteous and can offer a useful answer — as a similar call to a utility or bank.
Malcolm, with some scars to show for it, would wholly concur. He would also add that it's a heck of a lot cheaper to deal with Government than with the premium rate numbers used by business and commerce. Or those wicked 0844 numbers one now needs to telephone for a GP's appointment.

Kaletsky's second point is:
responsibility. A junior official at HMRC may have been directly culpable in the case of the missing discs, but true responsibility is clearly located farther up the hierarchy. What ought to be challenged is not the principle of computerising information, nor the decision to merge Revenue and Customs, nor the cuts in staff. The obvious problem lay in the way that HMRC computers were designed and managed, which would seem to pin the blame primarily on the computer boffins, many of them working for private consultants, rather than civil servants themselves.
The sad truth is that is a chronic failure, and one on which the columnists of Private Eye have been dining out for years (in the current issue, number 1198, four paragraphs on the NHS's IT on page 12, and a half-a-dozen on EDS and the NAO on page 27). Kaletsky's valid point is that the heads on the block should be the Civil Service's advisers on IT, and the contractors themselves.

He expands on the theme of responsibility, and makes it his third point "focus", with one of the most pertinent observations Malcolm has seen in a long while:
people and social institutions, including even bureaucracies such as the HMRC or the FSA, will only accept a certain amount of regulation and government interference. If attempts to interfere with everyday life pass beyond this threshold, then intelligent regulation can quickly degenerate into mindless box-ticking, which only distracts attention from real dangers.
This reminded Malcolm of a time, perhaps thirty years back, witnessing two older heads discussing a work problem. She explained to him how to circumvent a fire-wall in the organisation's computer system. They were both of mature years, nearing retirement. They were both employed by ... the Ministry of Defence. So the quotation immediately above should be enshrined as "Kaletsky's Law", for it explains all that is wrong with the National Curriculum, among much else.

Finally, Kaletsky turns to the politics of the whole caboodle, and addresses what he sees as:
Gordon Brown's fatal flaw. Instead of making big decisions about the essential functions of government — foreign policy, law and order, energy and environment — Mr Brown seems to have an irresistible urge for fidgety interventions in every aspect of everyday life — banning plastic bags, creating tax subsidies for cycle commuters, introducing identity cards, saving jobs at Northern Rock.

The more Mr Brown engages in such micro-management, the more he will be sucked into one fiasco after another. That way lies ridicule and political defeat.
That seems to Malcolm to cover much of the ground. The pity is that the media want a scapegoat for every eventuality. And it is clear whom, for the time being, they have nominated for the position. That is, until, the great soap-opera of British politics moves on ... Sphere: Related Content

Wednesday, November 14, 2007

Malcolm goes off the rails

Irish trains have added significantly to general happiness, nowhere more so than with that incredibly well-kept (and fashionably three-hours late) train in John Ford’s The Quiet Man (a film which, in and around Cong, has become a major tourist industry in its own right).

The two railway scenes (Seán Thornton’s arrival, and his hauling the former Mary Kate Danagher off the Dublin train) were filmed at Ballyglunin (a.k.a. “Castletown”) station. When that was put on film, CIE was recently nationalised: even so, Engine 59 and a couple of vintage carriages were rounded up, and very fine they look. Malcolm is delighted to see Ballyglunin station is being brought back to life, in part because the Irish Government has an enlightened approach to reviving rail transport, in part to satisfy tourism: neither of which can be bad.

Now Iarnród Éireann are bringing new Class 22000 state-of-the-art DMU sets onto the Dublin-Sligo and other “Intercity” lines (and, in view of later events in this posting, long overdue). On looks alone, they are gorgeous: grey, Harrod’s green with gold.
________________________________________________________

Malcolm will contend (and frequently has done) that the finest piece of writing about Irish railways is by Flann O’Brien, doing a casual piece of Joycean criticism, and showing just how it should be done, in A Bash in the Tunnel (available on line).

O’Brien meets a suspected “toucher” (a cadger of drinks) in the Scotch House (which Malcolm is convinced he remembers, but of which there seems no relic). This stranger then narrates how:
his father had a pub and grocery business, situated near a large Dublin railway terminus. Every year the railway company invited tenders for the provisioning of its dining cars, and every year the father got the contract. (The narrator said he thought this was due to the territorial proximity of the house, with diminished handling and cartage charges.)
The dining cars (hereinafter known as 'the cars') were customarily parked in remote sidings. It was the father's job to load them from time to time with costly victuals--eggs, rashers, cold turkey and whiskey. These cars, bulging in their lonely sidings, with such fabulous fare, had special locks. The father had the key, and nobody else in the world had authority to open the doors until the car was part of a train. But my informant had made it his business, he told me, to have a key, too.

'At that time,' he told me, 'I had a bash once a week in the cars.' ...

When the urge for a 'bash' came upon him his routine was simple. Using his secret key, he secretly got into a parked and laden car very early in the morning, penetrated to the pantry, grabbed a jug of water, a glass and a bottle of whiskey and, with this assortment of material and utensil, locked himself in the lavatory...
'How long does a bash in the cars last?' I asked him.

'Ah, that depends on a lot of things,' he said. 'As you know, I never carry a watch.' (Exhibits cuffless, hairy wrist in proof.) 'Did I ever tell you about the time I had a bash in the tunnel?'

He has not--for the good reason that I had never met him before.

'I seen meself,' he said, 'once upon a time on a three-day bash. The bastards took me out of Liffey Junction down to Hazelhatch. Another crowd shifted me into Harcourt Street yards. I was having a good bash at this time, but I always try to see, for the good of me health, that a bash doesn't last more than a day and a night. I know it's night outside when it's dark. If it's bright, it's day. Do you follow me?'

'I think I do.'

'Well, I was about on the third bottle when this other shunter crowd come along--it was dark, about eight in the evening--and nothing would do them only bring me into the Liffey Tunnel under the Phoenix Park and park me there. As you know I never use a watch. If it's bright, it's day. If it's dark, it's night. Here was meself parked in the tunnel, opening bottle after bottle in the dark, thinking the night was a very long one, stuck there, in the tunnel. I was three-quarters way into the jigs when they pulled me out of the tunnel into Kingsbridge. I was in bed for a week. Did you ever in your life hear of a greater crowd of bastards?'

'Never,'

'That was the first and last time I ever had a bash in the tunnel.'
________________________________________________________

Probably the most widely-known railway journey in Irish literature is Percy French’s trip on the West Clare Railway. This took place in the summer of 1896. French was to give a performance at Kilkeel, but the West Clare Railway failed to get him there in time (explanation: “weeds in the boiler"). Out of that came French’s ballad:
You may talk of Columbus's sailing
Across the Atlantical Sea
But he never tried to go railing
From Ennis as far as Kilkee
You run for the train in the morning,
The excursion train starting at eight
You're there when the clock gives the warnin'
And there for an hour you'll wait
And as you're waiting in the train,
You'll hear the guard sing this refrain:

Are ye right there, Michael, are ye right?
Do you think that we'll be there before the night?
Ye've been so long in startin',
That ye couldn't say for certain'
Still ye might now, Michael,
So ye might!
This is one of those stories where the facts should not get in the way of the myth. And according to the myth, French sued the Railway for loss of earnings and was awarded £10 compensation. The Railway appealed the judgment (and seem to have have counter-sued for libel). The legend has it that French arrived late for this hearing, and was taken to task by the judge. French gave his apologies with the excuse he had travelled by the West Clare Railway. Various accounts have “case dismissed” and an award of one penny damages. Malcolm cannot find a totally reliable source for this part of the story; and and has always suspected French himself improved on the facts considerably. However, there is a “transcript” of the trial on line.

French studied engineering at TCD, and spent rather more time in the music-halls than the lecture theatre. Eventually he took his degree and went to work for the Midland Railway. Later he became the drains-inspector for the County Cavan.

Malcolm feels he spends an unhealthy amount of his recent literary life reading about and writing about drains-inspectors. "Captain" W.E. Johns of “Biggles” fame was in the same trade, in Norfolk; and Terry Jones maintains that Chaucer’s role as Clerk of Works qualified him, too, as an “inspector of drains”.

It was while French was nosying down Cavan sewers he wrote the Mountains of Mourne, and his career took off. It also provided him with the material for the Song of William, Inspector of Drains (which featured in the King William College quiz last Christmas.

Now, every parade (including one of Malcolm's useless knowledge) runs the risk of rain. Today’s comes courtesy of Frank McNally doing An Irishman’s Diary for the day’s Irish Times. McNally had been relating the problems suffered last Sunday by the 5.05pm from Dublin, Connolly, which took seven hours to reach Sligo. He suggests this endurance trial might also provide:
excellent material for a simple, 36-verse ballad.

As I envisage it, the song would begin optimistically, with the train racing towards Kilcock, full of high spirits (if not water). A note of concern might creep in at Enfield, where the engine would be making strange noises. Then the breakdown would occur and it would be a low descent into horror: from the depletion of tbe tea trolley, to the passengers’ desperate but vain sortie out into Apache country—Westmeath, as it's known locally—to the terrible moment when the passengers first contemplate cannibalism.

That thought would quickly turn into action (“.. .and before we left Killucan/The poor trolley boy was cookin’', etc); so that when the train finally limped into Sligo, the surviving passengers would disembark sadder, wiser, and united by a dark secret.
To Malcolm, this sounds a direct steal from W.S.Gilbert's Yarn of the Nancy Brig.

Unfortunately, in his piece, McNally also dismantles the Percy French story:
The Irish Times archive's last word on the subject is from April 1961, when the newspaper's radio reviewer tracked the myth back to a documentary of a few years before, which had attributed such a sweet resolution of the dispute to the imagination of the composer himself.

The documentary had made clear that "no action came into court". Nevertheless. the event had entered folklore. Our radio reviewer noted that a Sunday newspaper had since found at least one elderly Clare man who remembered seeing French board the train in Ennis en route to attend the case.

Earlier the same year, on February 1st, 1961. this newspaper also recorded the tearful closure of the railway. Even this event was mishandled by CIE. To prevent embarrassing scenes, the company cancelled the final scheduled service out of Ennis, so that what was supposed to be the penultimate train was in fact the last.

Such a dastardly ploy had been foreseen, however. The earlier train was packed and hundreds lined the route to watch it pass. The final passengers drank bottle of stout when the engine pulled into Kilkee for the last time, a large crowd serenaded it with French's song, proving that there really is no such thing as bad publicity.
Malcolm’s view on the West Clare Railway is that, like the old adage, if he wanted to get there, he wouldn’t start from here.

A three-foot gauge railway, with authentic vintage steam traction, from Ennis to Kilrush, would be a modern promoter’s dream to rival any other Oirish attraction. William Percy French would be vindicated, particularly if (inevitably) the journey ran late.

That closure in 1961 now seems very short-sighted.
________________________________________________________ Sphere: Related Content

Saturday, November 10, 2007

Malcolm gets spooky, and economical ... about Dolly?

Long years ago, Malcolm found he had to leave University, and go out and get a job. He tried to postpone the inevitable by applying for a British Council scholarship to Eastern Europe. Somewhat to his surprise, he was summoned to an interview in London, at their expense.

Now, it was somewhat traditional for Trinity students to take the Mail-boat and the Irish Mail, but charge for the return air-ticket (which is why used ticket stubs were worth a round of drinks). The differential would cover beer-money for more than a week. One diligent soul (about to take a First in Maths) stacked up interviews with all the London insurance brokers and agencies, charged each one for Aer Lingus and a night in a hôtel, but slept on a friend's couch. That was regarded as a coup, particularly when he then opted for a higher degree. It doesn't work that way anymore, which is another strike against Ryanair.


A London day, circa 1965

So, a younger and greener Malcolm (What has changed?) headed off to the Smoke.

And found Davies Street. An imposing and very-official red brick and Portland stone building. He was escorted through the corridors and staircases by a uniformed functionary. And was subjected to a quite extraordinary interview.

Five minutes in, Malcolm realised there was a certain amount of cross-purposes here. He hadn't taken the whole thing at all seriously (Indeed, how little has changed!). The panel included a ferretty person, seated to one side. He, rather pointedly, had not been introduced by name, but from the nature of his questions, was no mere ancillary. Malcolm sensed that the chairman of the panel, an avuncular headmasterly sort of person, seemed to be deferring to this one.

Nobody, except Malcolm, seemed greatly interested in what further studies he might be proposing: which, probably was just as well. Far more significant, it seemed, was Malcolm's political attitudes and activities, with whom he consorted in Dublin (especially his political connections), and ... his leisure reading.

Ferret probed hard on this one.
What newspapers did Malcolm read? The Irish Times and The Guardian.
And on a Sunday? The Sunday Times and The Observer.
Did he read any weeklies? Yes, New Statesman and Tribune.
A heart-beat's pause at this. A slight furrowing of the ferret's brow.
And did Malcolm take the Economist? Curious phrasing that: all the ferretty rest had been, "Do you read?", but now "Do you take?"
Malcolm was rather tired of the whole thing by now, and came close to an expostulation: no, on a student's income it was beyond his means. He tried to look at the magazine, "occasionally, when he could".

What could all this mean?

Perspiring, perturbed and puzzled, somewhat shaken (if not stirred) Malcolm was delivered back to the street, again by the same closely-attending functionary.

In those benighted days, it would be the rest of the afternoon before the pubs opened, so Malcolm wandered the West End.

Economist with the verité

On reflection, then and later, Malcolm came to conclude the Economist was somehow the reason why he failed the interview. So the magazine became talismanic for him.

In his political years, Malcolm came to realise that the Economist was sound on facts, and consistent on opinions (which could always be spiced up from a quick scan of the leftist propaganda-sheets anyway). The admixture of the two threads served Malcolm well. And so Malcolm found he had gained a small reputation as an orator at Labour Party dos.

In his declining years, Malcolm still reads the Economist, more for delight than edification. The current issue, for instance, has a very nice opinion piece under the Lexington banner: Dollywood values.

One might expect a dour view of Ms Dolly Parton and her do-it-yourself theme park in the wilds of Tennessee. That, though, is not the Economist way:
Sophisticates sneer at Ms Parton's theme park. The Daily Express, a British paper owned by a man who also peddles pornography, calls it “tacky”. But the values it represents are as American as a 3lb-pound slice of apple pie. Dollywood's calorific abundance is quite healthy compared with Hershey Chocolate World in Pennsylvania. Its patriotism seems restrained next to the nearby Patriot Park, with its annual Patriot Festival. Its brand of Christianity is less in-your-face than, say, the Holy Land Experience in Florida. It is tolerant, too. Ms Parton has many gay fans, who hold unofficial get-togethers at her park. Her grandfather was a hellfire preacher, but Ms Parton has an empathy for sinners. As a girl, she thought the town hooker in her make-up and stilettos was the prettiest thing she had ever seen. “She was trash,” Ms Parton tells interviewers, “And I thought: That's what I want to be when I grow up.”
So, Mr Ferret at the British Council (or whatever you really were), Malcolm owes you a debt. The experience of being taken apart by an interviewer was salutary and cathartic. You turned Malcolm on to a continuing lesson in English prose style, in weekly instalments, which has proved more pleasurably relevant, of greater durability, and extensive than any university course.

Now, if only Malcolm could emulate that model. Sphere: Related Content

Friday, November 9, 2007

Malcolm's political incorrectness shows

By courtesy of makethemaccountable and a chain e-mail comes this:
A little jello wrestling, a little cheesecake, and, voila! Problem solved

By way of Amanda at Pandagon, who learned of it from Echidne, comes the news that Atrios was on C-SPAN the other night and he got asked the question.

You know THE Question.

"Where are all the women bloggers?"

Sigh.

As I wrote in Amanda's comments, "That question, 'Where are all the women bloggers?' a babelfish would translate as 'I only know the names of four or five bloggers. You, the guy I'm interviewing right now, and I just learned your name from my producer. Matt Drudge, Glenn Reynolds, and Mickey Kaus. Frankly, that's more names than my head can hold and I'm really not interested in reading any blogs. Can you please say something that will stir up a little controversy on the subject and help keep me awake through the rest of this interview?'"

But I think another way to translate it is, "Hey, fella, how come I have to sit here with you, a boring, pasty-faced white guy, instead of some hot chick in a mini-skirt, and, by the way, do you have Wonkette's phone number?"

There are plenty of women blogging, of course. What there are not are any who are regularly linked to by the top five or six male bloggers (Wonkette is a special case), who are the only ones the producers who book slots for talk shows care about.

I don't think the reason for this is sexism, although sexism always seems to come into play when those top male bloggers try to explain why they don't link to more female bloggers.

I think the reason is an extreme narrow-mindedness---or, to put it more flatteringly, a laser-like focus on a single aspect of human behavior. The top dog bloggers are almost autistically obsessed with politics as it's practiced in Washington D.C.

A good thought, says Malcolm. Put aside the insistence on life inside the Beltway, and the same could be said of our local scene.

We have the Big Boys like Iain Dale, Mick Fealty, and one or two more, but where is the Irish/British blogistas? Notice that Malcolm eschews the snidery of Paul Staines (by name and by nature) posing as "Guido Fawkes", who attempts a miscegenation of tabloidism and Matt Drudge.

In passing. Malcolm notes that Mick has de-hatted an analogous leporid today:

Lies, damned lies and…

Ireland 8th in the world for the empowerment of women? Can’t believe it? The answer’s simple: there’s not been a male President since Mary Robinson won office in 1990. IN fact the Republic comes 74th in terms of women’s representation in parliament and 28th for the number of women in Government”.

______________________________________

In the minimal world of our parochial archipelagian politics there are several useful female bloggers. Louise Bagshawe (Thursdays) and Theresa May (Fridays) do regular columns for Tim Mongomerie's ConservativeHome, which Malcolm revisits anytime he feels Tories might be encroaching into rationality. Both are outshone by the MP for Mid-Beds, Nadine Dorries, now properly acknowledged by the BCS for her presentation and content.

As for Lynne Featherstone of the LibDims, her site merely points up why Nadine Dorries's is so good. Featherhead is the supreme egoist: any politics always seem in third place to the personality-cult and the cheapest point-scoring (in that order). And why is the site hosted off-shore?

On the other (sensible) wing of politics there is the estimable Antonia Bance blogging from Rose Hill and Iffley.
______________________________________

But for the true, the blushful Hippocrene, Malcolm turns to two print-based sources which also appear on line: Tamzin Lightwater at the Spectator and Tara Hamilton-Miller at the New Statesman.

Both are, allegedly, deep inside the Tory Central beast. Tamzin twitters indiscreetly, but with delicious pertinacity, about the doings of the higher echelons of the Tory bureaucracy (including the inevitable Mrs Spelperson), while Tara tends to be a bit more cerebral (too much so to be a convincing Tory). Just when we were determining we need not concern ourselves about their doubtful femininity to enjoy their content, Malcolm, ever the butterfly mind, suddenly intrudes a recollection of Pepys diary for 22 April 1664:
to Hide Parke where great plenty of gallants, and pleasant it was, only for the dust. Here I saw Mrs Bendy, my Lady Spillman’s faire daughter that was, who continues yet very handsome.
He wonders if La Spelman can be any relation to Mrs Bendy.
______________________________________

For a change, this week Tara is the outright winner in bitchery. She has a delightful piece on the Top ten Tory twits, which should be essential reading. What is more remarkable, she does so without including Boris (only a pleasure deferred, surely), except in so far as this:
"Bonkers" Tories were of much higher quality in the Eighties and Nineties. What has happened to the rogues gallery of proper scoundrels, good old-fashioned trouser-droppers such as Mellor, Archer, Edwina? Yes, there's Boris, but even he hasn't put a foot wrong for nearly a month. This is not to say the boy David doesn't have to keep a watchful eye on his flock.

Over the years, the party has attracted eccentrics and surreal characters; their kind will continue to make column inches, and David will continue to be woken by many late-night phone calls.
______________________________________


Further back Malcolm recalls the fruit-cake MP (1950-1964) for Kidderminster, Sir Gerald Nabarro, who achieved fame in 1963, and anticipated Enoch Powell and Nigel Hastilow, by expostulating on the BBC Any Questions programme: "How would you feel if your daughter wanted to marry a big buck nigger with the prospect of coffee-coloured grandchildren?". Nabarro's secretary in the Commons was Christine Holman (surely a blogista manquée) later to achieve distinction in her own right by being married to Neil Hamilton of the brown-paper envelopes.

Of that same era there was, eccentric but no twit, the formidable Dame Irene Ward, 38 years an MP, mainly for Tynemouth. Let us, as we pass by, recall Alan Plater's description of Tynemouth: "All mink coats and no knickers".

Irene Ward went into Parliament by defeating Margaret Bondfield, the first woman to hold Cabinet office at Westminster (but not the first woman minister in the UK: that was, of course, Con Markiewicz, Minister of Labour in the outlawed First Dáil). Irene Ward must be unique in having insulted, to their faces, both Winston Churchill and Adolf Hitler ("What absolute bosh you are talking!"). Malcolm persists in believing that it was Irene Ward (not Bessie Braddock or Nancy Astor) who was involved in the exchange with Churchill:
She: Winston! You're drunk!
He: Madam, you're ugly. But tomorrow I shall be sober.
Malcolm recalls, from the mid-1960s, seeing her arrive, behatted and in full sail, for a Friday night train out of King's Cross, as he was arriving on the opposite platform: royalty could not achieve such grandeur.
______________________________________

The mystery which remains in Tara's list is this:
A shadow secretary of state, who shall remain nameless, decided to sing and briefly weep to a Radiohead song in a northern university student union (determined, clenched, porcine fist punching the air during the rocky bit). She sang with such feeling that even the greasy left-wing undergraduates in the smoky basement were moved enough to keep the experience private.
Malcolm gathers that a small amount of serious money is on offer, from Hugo Rifkind in the Times People column, for further clarification thereof.

That, sadly, is as near as UK local politics gets to jello wrestling and cheesecake. However, if the story could be less precise, would Mary Harney (left: for the only time in her life) fit the bill? Sphere: Related Content

Thursday, November 8, 2007

Malcolm's retrospection

This posting was going to be about Michael Gove's piece on British cinema. That may still appear, if Malcolm gets his act together.

Then, tonight, came the Flood Warnings for the East Coast, for Great Yarmouth and Lowestoft, the news that Rotterdam and the Thames Barrier were closing down.

Malcolm went to the Environment Agency and found that Wells-next-the-Sea had its own flood warning. And it all came back.


That's Wells, photographed from the air next morning, Sunday 1st February, 1953. Malcolm's down there somewhere, probably just left of the Church. We're looking a bit south of west from this angle.

Unlike today's prior advice, late that evening, nobody knew it was coming. There had been no warning. In those days there probably was no efficient way of conveying a warning, apart from the war-time air-raids sirens and the Lifeboat maroon ...

Electricity had only come to Wells a handful of years previously. And with the electric light came the blessedness of mains sewage (our society will collapse when the sewage pumps pack in). The nearest television transmitter was at extreme range (Tacolneston, near Norwich was not broadcasting until 1955): there may have been a couple of TV sets in town at best. To most 21st century bods, that must seem primeval.

Then, on a Saturday evening, the norm was to listen to "Sports Report" on the Light Programme for the football results (Norwich City had played a score draw with Coventry in the Third Division, South) then go to the Regal Cinema or to the pub, or just to doze at home. It was a foul night, squalls and gales, so the third choice appealed to most.

Around nine o'clock the film at the Regal stopped. This was not unusual with the temperamental equipment available, and evinced the customary groan and derisive whistles. The cinema manager came on the proscenium "stage", and, after a moment or so, was heard in something like silence. The tide was over the quay wall, he said, and the police were advising the closing of the cinema and all and sundry to go home...

There was an loud buzz of conversation as the audience made their way out.

Malcolm's younger self tried to make it down to the Quay, but the waves were already washing up Staithe Street, well past the "Golden Fleece". By the time he made it back to Church Plain, doubling back round the alley-ways, there was sea-water in Marsh Lane, blocking off the railway station in the dip at the bottom of Standard Road and the Polka. Until then nobody had pointed out this delineated the old medieval coastline before the seawalls had gone up, and that Ramm's Marsh was restored to just that.

Fred Hunt's chicken-run (that's his house next to St Nicholas's, in Church Street), was going from soggy to drowned. A lot of poultry would be lost that night: curiously, when the compensation was announced, they were all prime birds just coming into lay.

There was more than a trace of dampness on the floor of the cellar at the "Bowling Green", where Steward-and-Patteson mild-and-bitter was still drawn by hand. There would still be "K" winter ale available at that time of year.

The avatar that lies behind Malcolm (one wonders if there is a Sir John Wotton ambiguity in there) was told firmly to stay indoors. When he was not noticed, he slipped into his wellington boots and out the back-door (a zeugma, no less!). This was too good to miss.

By the time he got round the corner to the Church Hall, the choppy water was into his boots. There were many people in the street, all of whom knew him and ordered him home.

His personal hero of the night was Peter Sillitoe, who tried repeatedly to swim into his own house to rescue his sister Una's dolls.

After that the memories are more sketchy.

He recalls the north side of Freeman Street with the houses reduced to fascias, behind which was a foetid grey stew of broken possessions and wood. The old sea wall would have to be deliberately broken to allow that trapped water to escape.

The mile-long sea-wall, leading down to Wells beach, was broken into two places, muddy gaps a hundred yards wide, through which the tides would continue to pass for weeks to come.

Later the rescue services arrived. There were jet engines on trolleys used to try to dry out the old flint cottages: these would probably do more harm than good.

Months later the whole primary school was lined up in the playground and each child received a dole of coffee and currants. The currants were from California, and the coffee from the Emperor Haile Selassie. Yes, Malcolm and his fellows received food-aid from Ethiopia.

The whole story of the East Coast Floods is on the Eastern Daily Press website.
____________________________________________

Today, Wells is a town of yachties and second-homers, down from London for the weekend. Behind that show of prosperity it is still a place of relative poverty and deprivation: have a look at the latest Ofsted findings for the Alderman Peel School:
Almost all students are of White British background. One student in five is eligible for free school meals. This is above average, but seasonal employment patterns mean that more students experience social and economic disadvantage. Students' attainment on entry to the school is below average, with relatively few attaining beyond the expected level for their age. Just over 7% of students have statements of special educational needs.
The year of the 1953 Flood, Malcolm's cohort was about to go into the "top class", Mrs Self's class (Mrs Self of the "Ship Inn", a decent pub later to fall on hard times as the rebuilt "Ark Royal"), at Wells County Primary School. By modern standards, classes were over-large. There was the hurdle of the 11+. Half of Malcolm's class went on to Fakenham Grammar School, and many to professional careers. That is why this blog is here. As Malcolm and his professorial brother have often speculated: how could a school where none of the teachers, except perhaps the headmaster who seemed not to teach much, had any professional qualifications, do so well by its students?

Last weekend the Sunday Times property supplement featured a building site on the front at Wells:
Perhaps by the 6 a.m., high tide tomorrow morning, there may be a further item to be entered under "The Problems" there.

Back in 1953, there were two-up, two down cottages going for a couple of hundred pounds. Probably the whole town could have been buyable for £350,000. Sphere: Related Content

Tuesday, November 6, 2007

Malcolm worries about whales...

It's the little things that niggle. Serious problems we generally manage to ignore, or at least bury in our consciousness.

Malcolm developed a closed mind to things like impending examinations (with the result that, for three decades after leaving Trinity, he was plagued by a persistent nightmare of re-sitting his subsidiary subject). Global warming and a world credit crunch pass him by as the idle wind, which he respects not.

Then, out of the woodwork comes a genuine and lasting itch to be scratched.

Today's is by courtesy of the BBC website, reporting a trite poll about daft laws:
The most absurd international law was judged to be in the US state of Ohio, where it is illegal to get fish drunk.
The 3,931 people asked selected the laws from a shortlist of bizarre rules.
A total of 27% of those questioned thought the law against dying in the Houses of Parliament was the most absurd, while 7% voted for the legislation banning placing postage stamps upside down.
In third place, with 6%, came a law stating that only a clerk in a tropical fish store has permission to be topless in public in Liverpool.
The one that came to occupy his attention was:
The head of any dead whale found on the British coast automatically becomes the property of the King, and the tail of the Queen.
Now, Malcolm is Norfolk born, Norfolk bred ("strong in the arm, weak in the head"), and originated in the small seaside town of Wells-next-the-Sea.

When he was very young, a whale's carcass was washed up on Holkham beach. Malcolm remembers, having bicycled down to inspect, he was singularly disappointed by the size of the whale: this was no fit match for Captain Ahab and his doughty crew. Only later did it intrude into his growing consciousness that whales, like dogs, came in different varieties.

The point was that the local authority was responsible for disposing of what was rapidly becoming a noxious and offensive pile of offal. N0body seemed greatly concerned who got the head or the tail. Three local authorities, Wells Urban District, and the two Rural Districts covering Walsingham and the Burnhams, held sway over barely a mile or so of coastline.

At which point, Malcolm displays sheet 125 of the Ordnance Survey One-Inch map, copyright 1954, to prove it. We believe you, Malcolm, we truly do.

None of these three Councils had a population of more than three thousand at best. The invoice for burying even such a modest whale would make a substantial hole, both literally, and in terms of the balance sheet.

Mysteriously, over three nights, the whiffy whale moved itself across the three Council boundaries. There was some attempt to blame the tide: those, who believed themselves in the know, reckoned that underwriting the beer fund of a local well-known citizen, of a poaching disposition, and with access to a tractor, also played a part.

By this time the whale was somewhat friable (though the memories of wartime foodstuffs were too recent for anyone to think of fried whale-meat). Passers-by were observing from further and further off.

It so happened that Walsingham was furthest from the action, and so was the neighbour who was well and truly beggared. The whale was duly interred (or ensanded) by the same party who had been shifting it nocturnally. Since this individual was effectively paid four times, and in substantial part the final bill befell to the Coke family (of Holkham Hall and the main local landlord), it was a matter of considerable delight to him. And amused local dissidents.

A further warming of his cockles was that the Coke family included both Lord Leicester (who reared pheasants, suitable for the poaching thereof) and his brother, the Chairman of the local Magistrates' Bench (before whom said individual from time to time appeared). Thereby honour was indeed satisfied.

Now, as to those topless clerks of tropical fish .... Sphere: Related Content

Sunday, November 4, 2007

Malcolm suggests...
It's the paperwork, stupid!


Last week there was a Democratic Presidential debate. As the way-out-in-front runner, Hillary Clinton was inevitably ambushed by all the other wannabes.

According to Matt Drudge, semen-stain-sniffer to the gentry, a major "issue" to emerge is the amount of paper held by the Clinton Presidential Library which had not yet been made public.

This amounts to 3,022,030 documents, plus emails, plus photgraphs. It seems that some 13,400 documents have already been released. Altogether, that is a total of 3,039,335 pieces of material.

Now, assuming that President Bill was on the job 24/7, and not forgetting a couple of leap-year days, that means the Clinton White House was producing documents, all relevant to Hillary's candidacy, at the rate of one every 43⅓ seconds. That's day-and-night, no holidays allowed, no sleep, no rest breaks, for eight solid years.

And, to read the shocked protests from Obama and co., they're all relevant, and they're all deserving, immediately, of public scrutiny.

Malcolm can hardly contain his enthusiasm; but he thinks he'll wait for the paperback to come out.
______________________________________

The good news is that Chris Cillizza is back to do a running election blog, The Fix, for the Washington Post. Sphere: Related Content
In which Malcolm takes a Sabbath day's dander through some cheery things of life, and in which

Malcolm ventures an opinion...

... even though he fully expects the wrath of Zach (Malcolm's authority on all things to do with Texan singer-songwriters) to descend upon him cyberspatially, from http://ohgotohell.blogspot.com/.

That said, Malcolm is currently listening to, and enjoying Stayton Bonner's new CD, Cadillac Road.

At one level, Bonner is yet another of the artists coming off the Austin, Texas, production-line. In itself, that is no put-down; to be able to hold one's own against such competition is itself no mean achievement. His voice is light, even gentle; it never dominates or demands: sometimes the pitch is approximate at best. On the other hand, his work evidences musicianship: the banjo/Mandolin/whatever accompaniment (mainly, Malcolm believes, Eddie Collins) is first-rate. The whole feel is nearer the folk world than the good ol' country boys: a Townes van Zandt in the making, Malcolm wonders.

That's not the whole of it.

What attracted Malcolm's attention in the first place was the third track on the album: Black Bush Whiskey Straight. An anthem to Malcolm's favourite medication!

After that, it was a matter of looking at what else Mr Bonner is up to. The first, and title track, Cadillac Road is a celebration of the road-trip across the Panhandle: other tracks are also taken from a High Plains drifter journey: Quality Inn Confessional; El Camino; Going New Mexico; and Gas Station Coffee. It's good to find an album that adopts a thematic approach, rather than being just a hodge-podge of miscellanea. The journey is completed by a wry piece, Armadillo Boogie Woogie, where a hunt for Dasypus novemcinctus results in bagging the family Chevy.

One other track caught Malcolm's attention: Cemeteries & Second Hand Bookshops. Again, such places are, together and separately, fascinations of Malcolm. It was a clue that Bonner has (in Dennis Healey's famous metaphor) a hinterland. Sure enough, that led to Malcolm discovering that Bonner had written A Story About Larry McMurtry's Other Day Job.

This is an essay, not a book, more of a pamphlet, called The Bookman, and the subtitle says it all. Larry McMurtry is a distinguished author in his own right. Lonesome Dove, both as book and tv adaptation, gave Malcolm considerable pleasure, and inspired a reading stint of what the local bookshop had of McMurtry's other work. Recently, of course, McMurtry fame has been further burnished by the Oscar for the screenplay of Annie Proulx's Brokeback Mountain.

What Malcolm had not appreciated was that McMurtry was a book-collector and dealer of some stature. So, here is John Schwartz in a 2001 article for the New York Times:
... in his hometown [Archer City], population 1,748, one of America's most celebrated living writers is digging through boxes of old books in the ovenlike heat of the sorting room at his vast secondhand book business, Booked Up. Mr. McMurtry has been building his inventory the last four years, hoping, with the cooperation of other booksellers, to turn Archer City into ''book town'' with many shops -- a place for serious bibliophiles to make their pilgrimage.
Booked Up, it seems, survives with only a polite and thoroughly-decent on-line presence.

Nor can Malcolm pass over Archer City without making a further link. The town became was fictionalised as "Anarene", with its town cinema, the Royal, for McMurtry's early novel, The Last Picture Show. That was, of course, filmed for Peter Bogdanovitch's elegiac 1971 movie (for which McMurtry also did the screenplay). Burned out, rebuilt in the 90s, the Royal is enjoying a new lease of life as a local arts center. Another happy ending.


And, in yet another mental jump, Malcolm connects Larry with James, father to son, author/bookseller to another Austin singer/songwriter. And a powerful voice for the anti-War coalition. Which makes that campaign poster of Barry Goldwater in Larry McMurtry's book-store ("In your heart, you know he's right"), on the odd side of ironic. (Malcolm never recalls that slogan without also recalling the LBJ campaign gloss, allegedly by Bill Moyers, "In your guts you know he's nuts.")



_____________________________

So Malcolm's characteristic commodius vicus of recirculation brings him back to Stayton Bonner. Bonner wrote for Texas Monthly about Bruce Robison, whose Travelin' Soldier was recorded by the Dixie Chicks on their Home album. Bonner's report included the wryful:
"The Dixie Chicks recorded 'Travelin' Soldier,' one of the first songs I wrote, and it did great until the girls got embroiled in that crazy media-frenzy.
Hey, it can get tough when the message runs counter to the local mood.

_____________________________

And so, with the sun well below the November horizon, and darkness settling on North London, Malcolm reaches for a snifter of Black Bush. He thanks Mr Bonner for putting the idea into his head. And benignly wishes the rest of yous as tranquil an evening.
Sphere: Related Content

Saturday, November 3, 2007

Would Malcolm buy a second-hand policy from this man?

... because Diddy Dave Cameron is obviously in lurve with the great State of Wisconsin.

Back in May of this year, he was lauding their schools:
He pointed to the charter schools of Wisconsin and other US states and education reform in Sweden, where more schools are receiving public funds but being freed to operate independently of municipal control...
The trust schools of Wisconsin were particularly singled out for praise by David Cameron this week. He claimed that in areas of the state where charter schools had been established, fourth-grade science scores had risen 20% in three years.
For the record, Wisconsin's educational record is ranked eighth in the Nation, on a par with its neighbour Iowa, and a long way behind the North-east States like Vermont, Massachusetts and Connecticut.

Furthermore, it is difficult to make precise comparisons between Wisconsin and the rest of the US on straight socio-economic comparisons. In Wisconsin just 29.3% of students are classed as "economically disadvantaged": across the nation it is 40.9%. There are just 3.4% of students identified as "English language learners": across the whole country it is 8.5%.

Going nowhere fast?

Then, when Malcolm looks at the attainment figures, he finds something quite disturbing.

The eighth-grade scores, according to the State test, show quite remarkable improvements: reading is "at or above proficient": for 84.5% of students in 2005, up from 80% the previous year. So, well done, everybody! For Math, the improvement is even more spectacular: 73.6% "at or above proficient" in 2005, compared to a measly 65.9% in 2004. Whew!

So why does the National Assessment of Educational Progress, a branch of the US Department of Education, come up with such a different picture? According to the NAEP, Wisconsin reading "at or above proficient" eighth-grade level was just 35% in 2005, down from 37% in 2003. The Math figure was 36%, up 1% on the earlier figure. Hmmm...

Always use a good speech at least twice

His closing speech to the Tory Conference (3rd October) promised:
In states like Wisconsin in America where they've cut benefit roles by 80 per cent, and the changes we will make are these: we will say to people that if you are offered a job and it's a fair job and one that you can do and you refuse it you shouldn't get any welfare.
This was recycled in a speech on 16th October 2007, when he was saying:
In states like Wisconsin in America they've cut benefit rolls by 80 per cent. We will follow their lead, and help people out of long-term poverty and into long-term employment.
The Nelsonian blind eye?

Now Fraser Nelson, in the current issue of The Spectator, has heard His Master's Voice, so we have again:
The invocation of Wisconsin — a state in America’s upper Midwest — would have passed over the head of most people in the Winter Gardens, let alone in the country. The word triggers few images, if any: snowploughs, badgers and perhaps bicycle lanes. But to policy wonks, it is the home of the most aggressive and successful welfare reform programme the world has ever seen — which became the template for Bill Clinton’s federal reform. And this was what Mr Cameron seemed, quite explicitly, to sign up to.
An important article, well worth more study.

Poverty knocks, or knocking poverty?

The crux of Nelson's piece is that "poverty lost in Wisconsin".

Well, that’s not quite what it says here (for 2005):
U.S. Census Bureau statistics ... found Wisconsin poverty rates rising faster than any other state – nearly two percentage points over the past couple of years. Wisconsin’s poverty rate is now 11 percent – the state’s highest poverty rate in more than a decade...
Real (adjusted for inflation) median household income has fallen by more than $4,000 since 1999. And after nine years of steady growth, Wisconsin’s median wage actually fell over 2003-04. The longer term picture is even darker. Median wages today are only 5 percent (68¢) above their level of a quarter century ago, despite the fact that worker productivity is up 70 percent. New data also show a serious decline in employer-provided health insurance.
Or here (for 2007):
From 1994 to 2003,Wisconsin’s poverty rate remained consistently below 10 percent, while the national rate ranged from 11 percent to nearly 15 percent and the Midwest as a whole had poverty rates as high as 13 percent. In 2004 Wisconsin’s poverty rate jumped to 12.4%, surpassing the average Midwest poverty rate for the first time since 1984 (though still not exceeding the national rate)...
The poverty rate in Wisconsin has stabilized again since the 2004 jump, hovering at just above 10 percent. ... one out of every ten Wisconsinites, and more than one out of every six children, lived in poverty in 2006. Moreover, one-quarter of Wisconsinites and one-third of Wisconsin’s children lived below 200% of the poverty threshold in the same year.
Now, as a life-long Labour voter, Malcolm would be more than happy to see a Conservative manifesto going the Wisconsin route:
Despite improvements in workforce education and productivity since 1979, the current median wage exceeds the 1979 value by just 49 cents per hour. And wages fell substantially in the last year, from $15.10 in 2005 to $14.69 in 2006.
  • Where one child in 20 has no health cover (though that’s considerably better than the US as a whole),
  • Where employer-provided health insurance is plummeting: from nearly three-quarters of employees in 1975 to just over half today;
  • Where over a third of Black Wisconsins are below the poverty line;
  • Where employment is growing at just 0.2% a year (2000-2006), less than the other Midwest States of Minnesota and Iowa.
Incidentally, the “poverty line” for a family of four is $20,615, below which 591,850 Wisconsiners (and a total of 38,757,253 Americans) manage to subsist.

Now, to the crunch

Wisconsin is not the UK.

In Wisconsin, the urban/rural split of population is roughly in terms of 2:1. The rural is very rural: there are fewer than a dozen centres with more than 50,000 populations. This means that poverty (and the African-American population) concentrates into a few areas, but especially Milwaukee. So, if Cameron's Wisconsin recipe works, it is proven in Milwaukee.
  • Milwaukee has had unemployment and poverty increasing progressively since the 1970s, because there has not been investment in high, knowledge-based technology.
  • The city has been unable to sustain and develop jobs which pay a living wage.
  • Wage rates have stagnated over four decades.
  • Poverty is concentrated in the ethnic minorities.
  • Well over a third of the "poor" are children.
So, here is Tom Held in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel:
Poverty in Wisconsin increased faster than in any other state in 2003 and 2004, the U.S. Census Bureau reported Tuesday, and Milwaukee climbed last year into the top 10 of the nation's poorest cities, reaching seventh.

More than 571,000 people in the state and 143,000 in the city were living without enough money to ensure they had adequate food, housing and other necessities, according to estimates based on Census Bureau surveys.

In Milwaukee, more than 62,000 of those living in poverty were children - 41.3% of all the children in the city. That poverty rate for children ranks the city fourth in the nation, tied with Miami.
So, Malcolm opines (derivatively, and without apology):
If Dave Cameron ever becomes PM , I warn you.
I warn you that you will have pain: when healing and relief depend upon payment.
I warn you that you will have ignorance: when talents are untended and wits are wasted, when learning is a privilege and not a right.
I warn you that you will have poverty: when pensions slip and benefits are whittled away by a government that won’t pay in an economy that can't pay.
I warn you that you will be cold: when fuel charges are used as a tax system that the rich don't notice and the poor can't afford.
I warn you that you must not expect work: when many cannot spend, more will not be able to earn. When they don't earn, they don't spend. When they don't spend, work dies.
I warn you not to go into the streets alone after dark or into the streets in large crowds of protest in the light.
I warn you that you will be quiet: when the curfew of fear and the gibbet of unemployment make you obedient.
I warn you that you will have defence of a sort: with a risk and at a price that passes all understanding.
I warn you that you will be home-bound: when fares and transport bills kill leisure and lock you up.
I warn you that you will borrow less: when credit, loans, mortgages and easy payments are refused to people on your melting income.
I warn you not to be ordinary. I warn you not to be young. I warn you not to fall ill. I warn you not to get old.
Sphere: Related Content

Thursday, November 1, 2007

Lower than lawyers?

Malcolm reckons everyone knows that scientists are switching from rats to lawyers for their experiments. The reasons for the change are:
  • Lab technicians develop emotional attachments to their rats. This interferes with the research.
  • Lawyers breed faster.
  • The RSPCA is not concerned about maltreated lawyers, and there are no problems from the anti-vivisectionists.
  • (All together now:) There are some things even a rat won't do.
The only remaining problem is extrapolating results to human beings.

But now Malcolm is amazed to find lawyers do not reign unchallenged in the pits of animate life.

Today's Baltimore Sun carries a report by Baltimore federal jury awarded nearly $11 million to the father of a Marine killed in Iraq. This was on the grounds that the family's privacy had been invaded by a group waving anti-gay signs at the funeral:
Westboro Baptist Church, a fundamentalist Christian group based in Topeka ... has protested military funerals across the country with placards bearing shock-value messages such as "Thank God for dead soldiers." They contend that the deaths are punishment for America's tolerance of homosexuality and of gays in the military.
It seems that the Westboro Baptists are largely a Mr Phelps (pictured left) and his extended family.

Mr Phelps and his Christian cohort blame disasters, including Hurricane Katrina, the Sept. 11 attacks and AIDS, on permissive morals which go against biblical teaching.
________________________________

Not to worry, though, the lawyers are on the case.

They are fighting back, for truth, freedom and justice for the Phelps family, and also to restore the proper social order in the abyss of pond-life slime:
Fred W. Phelps Sr., Westboro's founder, vowed to appeal ... "It's going to be reversed in five minutes," he said. This case, he added, "will elevate me to something important" ...
After the verdict, Phelps and his two daughters named in Snyder's lawsuit said they believed that it was really their religious beliefs that were on trial.

"The goofy jury threw a fit at God," Phelps said.
Isn't it nice to know when one is so clearly righteous and in the right? Sphere: Related Content

Malcolm's modest proposal

in which our hero solves the problems of devolution, the world and everything

  • Douglas Adams reckoned the best that could be said of Planet Earth (in the revised edition) was “mostly harmless”.
  • The Dilbert Principle is the observation that the most incompetent workers will be quickly promoted to the place they can do the least harm.
  • In Paul Eddington’s final interview, he proposed his own epitaph: he had done “little harm”.
There seems to be a pattern there. Could it be a template for government?

Meanwhile:

  • When the Social Workers in Tower Hamlets went on strike, the social problems recorded allegedly diminished.
  • When the medics in Israel went on strike, apparently fewer people were ill, and the death-rate improved.

All in all, it’s amazing what one can do without when one has to, and then feel better for it.

So (flash of light-bulb above head, rumble of drums) Malcolm proposes ...

The Belgium principle of harmless government

As Daniel Hannan is noting in today’s Daily Telegraph:

Belgium has now gone for 144 days without a government and you know what?… everything seems normal ...

Which prompts the thought: perhaps there should never be a Belgian government. Next week, Belgium will break its previous record for going unadministered, and no one – other than the armies of fonctionnaires who fret for their pensions – seems especially bothered.

If Belgium was a historical accident, then the “United Kingdom” was a geographical one, which has been soldered together by a banking system and by inheriting a (now defunct) empire.

Hannan again:

Belgium is failing because there are no real Belgians, just as there are no real Europeans. Rather, there are discrete peoples, with their own languages, television stations and political parties.

For “Belgium” read “United Kingdom”?

The ultimate devolution

They hold an election, and nobody comes.

And we're almost there already:

  • For local and Euro elections, we barely break sweat when we achieve less than 40% turn-outs: the system goes on regardless.
  • Malcolm guesses that few know the name of a single MEP, or the local Council leader.
  • The only time we get exercised is when the incompetence level transcends the incomprehension factor: the John Major effect, perhaps.

So, we should stay at home, yawn, and by default appoint the least active, least interventionist, least-competent-while-still-credible government in sight: a job for Boris and the LibDems, perhaps ...

You d'Hondt fool me

... or we go for the d'Hondt system we have imposed on Northern Ireland.

The result then is the only time anyone notices there is a government at all is those rarest of occasions when someone in it makes a decision, and the rest of the ministers are aghast at such impropriety.

Lewis Carroll would recognise the Caucus Race that is Northern Irish politics: everybody who is anybody has a job in the administration:

  • 108 MLAs represent an electorate of just 1.1M
  • A dozen Ministers have grandiloquent titles, and palatial offices (the catering is pretty good, too).
  • There is, of course, no such thing as an Opposition. This is the full beauty of an arrangement which would thereby delight a Hoxha, Ceaucesceau or Kim Jong Il,
  • Each department has to be scrutinised by a matching Committee, which needs a Chair and Vice-Chair.
  • There are half-a-dozen Standing Committees (also each needing a Chair and Vice-Chair).
  • Anybody of any stature, and few more besides, needs a bag-carrier, which soaks up any remaining unemployed MLAs.
It's a flock-wallpapered, leather-armchaired, 4* dining, internment camp for undesirables.

Law is for the lawyers ...


Medicine is for the doctors. Education is for the teachers. And government is for the politicians. All of whom need a small army of drones, acolytes, ancilliaries and support workers. It's all a matter of keeping people busy, doing as little harm as possible.

While the rest of us just get on with our lives, no fuss, hoping to be left alone, with just an occasional timid glance over our shoulders lest we be the target of the next "initiative".

_________________________________________

That, then, is Malcolm proposing:

... the non-campaign for non-government government.

With a one-word small amendment, we anapoliticians (we're too inert to be anarchists) can borrow from Tennyson for our non-campaign song:

Ring out, wild bells, to the wild sky,
The flying cloud, the frosty light:
The state is dying in the night;

Ring out, wild bells, and let him die.


Ring out the grief that saps the mind,

For those that here we see no more;

Ring out the feud of rich and poor,

Ring in redress to all mankind.

Ring out false pride in place and blood,

The civic slander and the spite;

Ring in the love of truth and right,

Ring in the common love of good.


Ring out a slowly dying cause,

And ancient forms of party strife,

Ring in the nobler modes of life,

With sweet manners, purer laws ...

or we could simply declare ourselves a non-territorial part of Belgium.

Sphere: Related Content
Subscribe with Bloglines International Affairs Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
 
Add to Technorati Favorites